|
|
|
|
|
by deadbabe
10 hours ago
|
|
If your choices are “reduce productivity, make money” or “increase productivity, but still make the same money”, why would you ever choose the latter? The thing about option 1 is that you still have “potential productivity” that you can tap into during critical times, where as in option 2, employees have already used up the “potential productivity” doing god knows what with AI, and you can’t push them more without breaking. |
|
Critical times thinking is considered ineffectivity last 30 years or so. Managers who do that are considered bad.