|
|
|
|
|
|
by rpdillon
3 hours ago
|
|
|
The video is educational. It uses an extreme scenario to make its point, but that's because it's being illustrative. Okay, so maybe you don't believe a lawyer. Let's try a different lawyer that's more famous. > So, there you have it: obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, and speech integral to criminal conduct. Throw in true threats - which was left out of this list for some reason - and child pornography, and you’ve got the categories. Note that the Court specifically identifies them as well-known and historic, not as in flux. https://www.popehat.com/p/the-first-amendment-isnt-absolute |
|
|