[joe_mwangi]

Since they plan to have null-restricted types, then I don't see any issue.

[Dylan16807]

> plan to

Well wasn't that the argument above, that the stuff they added so far isn't proper at least in part because they didn't fix that problem yet?

[joe_mwangi]

> yet But up the comment section, someone thinks they won't be there 'in the future'

[Dylan16807]

The comment that says it won't be there in the near future? That's seems like a reasonable claim to me.

And a promise to eventually fix a busted implementation doesn't undo it being busted for a significant amount of time.

[joe_mwangi]

Better late than never.