|
|
|
|
|
|
by UltraSane
43 days ago
|
|
|
The linear no threshold model is not supported by actual evidence. More accurate models include Linear-Quadratic (LQ) Model Threshold Model Hormesis model The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000927971... "They removed the "as low as reasonably possible" design goal which means it's now allowed to dump radioactive waste into a river to save money" This is just an incredibly stupid lie that completely destroys your credibility. The ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle paired with hyper-sensitive detection technology requires nuclear operators to spend billions on redundant safety features and extensive permitting for infinitesimal health benefits. This regulatory burden prices nuclear energy out of the market. |
|
|