Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bravetraveler 1 hour ago
I'd go even further: 'look at me, see what was paid for.'

This isn't much different than the 'builder brained' coworker who is obsessed with creating technical debt, not owning it. Throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks, passing it off as sage wisdom.

It'd be interesting to see the math behind offsetting the GPU crunching with more power efficient linting. Assuming every person or CI job switched (and the model stays offline), how many years are we looking at?

3 comments

Can someone with a deeper understanding of these sort of processes say something about the intricaies of building such a transformation process? Seems like constucting the architecture and feedback loops that guide the LLM to achieve a specific goal (byte wise bevhaviour replication) seems rather non trivial and as its on field of research? How common is it to achieve what the authors are publishing here as been having achieved? How elaborate are the achieved goals (i assume that what is specified here is rather precise and assume its true - in good faith for the sake of my question and as it is stated for the sake of being potentually reviewed/checked against)? How advanced are the metrics/behavioral constraints that guided the process? Whats the state of the art of this sort of ehm..reversereplication(?)archaeomorphic kyberneering(?), archaehylomorphic programming(?). Seems like an interesting approach and maybe thats also partially because I haven't seen such an approach - regarding the specificity and methology of defining the desired endresult.

[some speculative neologismification based on my (limited) understanding of ancient greek ethymology《to illustrate my aesthesis of that process. For the notion of hylomorphism see gilbert simondon ("machine") philosophy]

Adding: polite request to overlook potential orthographic deficiencies of text

Essentially pay-to-win for coding.
With moves like this, I'm not so sure victory is assured... but yes. Pay to play.
In this case, it’s maybe more “I can access that luxurious model you all pleb are banned from using”
Eh, I'm not that interested in participating in the marketing. I don't believe Fable/Mythos-lite/whatever is needed to translate. Or, as you call it, luxurious.

Fair point, though. Agreed in principle.