Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cwmoore 40 days ago
I agree but please, provide citations instead of a question mark, to make what you believe is obvious actually in fact obvious.
2 comments

> New combinations of circumstances — that is, new cases — constantly call for the application, which means in truth the extension of old principles; or, it may be, even for the thinking out of some new principle, in harmony with the general spirit of the law, fitted to meet the novel requirements of the time.

Law And Public Opinion In England, page 361 -> https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.40146/page/n38...

I think the question mark is good enough for such an absurd claim. If the author cares they can find quotes with no effort
I don't think so?
I don’t see any?