[SpicyLemonZest]

As the article says further down, it really depends on what exactly they said. I can easily see how describing your employer as being engaged in an “all-costs-justified AI build out” could cross the line from political advocacy which happens to impact Amazon to improperly representing Amazon and its business strategy.

There’d be no question, for example, that you can be fired for publishing Amazon’s full internal datacenter buildout plans, even if your city council says they’d like to see them.

[mbrumlow]

It’s fairly silly to work at Amazon if you don’t like data centers. And also stupid for Amazon to employ you if you don’t like data center and are actively making efforts in your free time and possibly while at work to prevent the construction of data centers.

You really have to question the motives of somebody who is anti data center working at Amazon to the point they may only work there to throw wrenches into plans for such.

Making it a “political issue” should not result in a company dealing with such issues.

You would never stand up for having doctor or nurses plotting to prevent abortions and potentially taking action on the job to prevent them.

[SpicyLemonZest]

I might stand up for a doctor who tells the city council not to authorize construction of a new hospital wing, even if the hospital really wants one. It would again depend on what they say and why. You can't wield your employer's name and proprietary information against them in the political scene, and political activism on the job is another story entirely, but you have every right to show up to city council meetings as a NIMBY even if your employer finds NIMBYs inconvenient.