[QuiEgo]

This argument has been beaten to death in the courts for hundreds of years at this point.

Why does everyone think that they are some kind of arm chair lawyer who magically knows the right way to read it, and everyone else is wrong?

As a country, we need to have a serious conversation about guns. This argument just makes noise and gets in the way of actually talking about the real issues.

The two real questions are:

1. what types of guns do we want people to be able to own - where do we as a society draw the line on what’s okay for people to have and what we want to keep in the domain of the government control. This is an incredibly difficult question, especially in a country that was founded in an armed revolution and also suffers mass shootings

2. Under what conditions do we remove someone’s right to own guns?

Let’s talk about that, not beating the wording horse to death for the millionth time.