Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by moogly 44 days ago
> The technology is so unbelievably safe and efficient these days

I think you mean unbelievably expensive and takes an eternity to build outside of China and Korea.

2 comments

> I think you mean unbelievably expensive and takes an eternity to build outside of China and Korea.

Japan was able to start construction on a new nuclear reactor and have its construction (and start commercial service) with-in five years, and did so every year from the mid-1980s to the early-2000s:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_commercial_nuclear_rea...

The first unit you build will be expensive, the second less so, the third even less. Economies of scale work just as well for nuclear plants as they do for widgets: Vogtle Unit 3 was expensive AF, Unit 4 cost 30% less.

Turns out if you don't know what you're doing, things can get be expensive because you're learning lessons along the way, but if/once you do know what you're doing costs drop.

The 5 years of construction is the fast part. How many years of planning and permits did it take before they broke ground?
If you have a site that's approved for a nuclear power, there is overhead in getting that approval, but once you have a site you can roll through multiple reactors.

It's similar to the housing crisis: all this talk about pre-built components to make building homes/mid-rises/etc faster ignores all the planning approval and NIMBY objections that need to be ploughed through first.

not that many either if the design is sufficiently flexible. That's how japan spewed several ABWR's so fast
It's not 2004 anymore.
These are not opposites. Both can be true.
Yes but I would say one trumps the other.