[Terr_]

It could be clearer and shorter, but I don't think its Billy-Madison-quote-level bad. I read it as:

1. Tries a title where "the law" could refer to both legal-statue and also metaphysical limits. (But, disappointingly, does not really deliver on both.)

2. Assert that there's a lower-bound (a "law") on how much work can be removed from a product or process.

3. Observe that some major tech products do not eliminate work so much as move it and take advantage of efficiencies of scale.

4. Claim that some CEOs seem to think they can use "AI" to repeat the same overall process against their own companies in a vaguely recursive way.

5. Dismiss that as foolish because the work is going somewhere, even if it's just to the company selling the inference, and ultimately paying a different development-org.