Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nderjung 1 day ago
Hi, Alex from Unikraft here. One clarification: Browser-Use didn't move away from Unikraft because of any limitation around browser startup times, snapshotting, scale-to-zero, or browser-level autoscaling. Those capabilities worked well and were a key reason they adopted the platform in the first place.

The challenge they encountered was at a different layer: horizontally scaling the underlying EC2 infrastructure. At the time, native EC2 fleet autoscaling wasn't yet supported by the platform, so they chose to take ownership of that part of the stack and build directly on Firecracker.

It's also worth noting that Unikraft is actively working on transparent infrastructure autoscaling (with live migration), so the gap they encountered is being addressed. The article's title may give the impression that unikernels were the bottleneck (they weren’t, and our platform transparently support Linux VMs as well), when in reality the decision was driven by infrastructure orchestration requirements rather than browser runtime capabilities.

As an aside, we love Browser-Use <3 and we still work together closely!

2 comments

One blog post how we built agent sandbox infrastructure with unikraft - we still use unikraft for agent sandboxes and love the technology.

https://browser-use.com/posts/two-ways-to-sandbox-agents

Unrelated but would be great to see an official easy way to integrate from Proxmox