|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
44 days ago
|
|
the fact that 10k tutorials exist says way more about the human urge to write, document, and share information than git itself. the 10k number is also a made up statistic. It might be 2k, it might be 20k. i use git daily and often fairly intensively, and i've read perhaps 5-10 tutorials, so the idea that "git requires 10k tutorials" just doesn't make any sense. if anything, the fact that something with good search-fu might find a tutorial more specifically catering to their background and needs seems like a huge plus for git. > Using P4 is: Download P4V, install plugin for $EDITOR, and double click on a changelist to submit. "a changelist" ... "what the hell is that? I've been editing my files, I don't have "a changelist"." and anyway, joining a company that's already using P4 is never, ever going to be that simple (even if it was actually that simple as the first user, which I question) |
|
Currently I use Fossil for most projects, but it's not a compelling choice (just like git) for when you have binary stuff. You've got `fossil uv` for unversioned files, but I think I would rather just sidestep the entire problem with a better versioning model than what we've settled on for text files.