[gwern]

> I remain deeply unconvinced...But I think your sensors are a bit miscalibrated.

That's unfortunate. Perhaps I should have mentioned before that the author of the post emailed me and said they had used LLMs extensively while writing it? Slipped my mind, I guess.

> including the part you label "blatantly Claude", and...they come out as 100% human

Pangram is designed to make many false negatives. I also checked the intro and got 100% human and shrugged; that's why I check towards the end, where if you tried the passage I specifically said comes up 100% AI, I assume that it would again. If Pangram can't hear it in that specific opening passage, oh well, doesn't make the rest go away.