[outlier99]

Yep https://www.pangram.com/history/d3fd8f73-af8a-4cdb-968e-7346...

[kangalioo]

How does Pangram detect this? How do we know this is any more reliable than just asking any HN user to judge a text for AI signs, i.e. how is this more authoritative than the comments you're responding to?

[computerphage]

https://www.pangram.com/research/how-it-works

[raincole]

> How do we know this

We don't. Pangram is HN's astrology. It has 99.99% accuracy (according to Pangram.)

[computerphage]

They claim it has a very low false-positive rate, which is meaningfully more nuanced than "accuracy".

"Detect AI-generated content with 99.98% accuracy." -pangram themselves

[drob518]

Oops… gotta say that I agree with the general message of the article, though.

[computerphage]

Why do you agree?