Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by viccis 4 days ago
Anthropic sowing: Hehe yeah guys check out this model it's super duper scary and powerful it's a huge deal

Anthropic reaping: Hey wait a second you weren't supposed to take that seriously it was just marketing :(

2 comments

It can both be true that models at Fable capability level are national security concerns while Anthropic is being hypocritical.

If the Trump admin is also willing to apply the same scrutiny to GPT-5.6 and other Fable-level models, I think it is a good thing. But given the admin's history with Anthropic (such as declaring it a supply chain risk while ignoring Chinese labs), there is some smell of targeting.

I'm not saying they're hypocritical. I'm saying that this would be far less likely to have happened had they not advertised its power by bringing up its danger.
Except they can't - mostly because Sam Altman is savvy enough to not shout from the rooftops the national security implications. The government can't regulate models because models are unmeasurable right now. And whatever test USG can create can be benchmaxxed in reverse eventually.

So at some point - don't say your model is capable of hacking even if it is and you are clean.

Was it not just a few weeks ago the government was telling Anthropic to take the guardrails off of the "super duper scary" models?

Now they want them back on?

AI for me and not for thee?

Or just another opportunity for a petulant administration to target Anthropic for not doing what they wanted the first time?

>AI for me and not for thee

100%, I mean we already have Mythos vs Fable

literally yes. that is what export restrictions do