|
|
|
|
|
by pj_mukh
3 days ago
|
|
The original article doesn’t care to explore the difference, it doesn’t even acknowledge there is a problem. If the article was “instead of a national ban, we should look at school-wide ban”, I would be sympathetic. FWIW, American states are doing exactly this[1], people still complain [1]: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/09/23/governor-newsom-signs-legi... |
|
My reading of the article is that it criticizes the implementation of this policy and the methodology behind it, which I agree with.
Living in a country that moved quickly from a "social media ban" to an "adult content ban" in the space of 3 months, I feel that these policies are overreach due to how they must be implemented. As in, they require all users to provide verification, not just the targeted cohort.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy92qpv424o