Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Hugsbox 3 days ago
I Fired theartofdoingstuff.com for extremely obnoxious ads - particularly the "Would you like to save this stuff?" one that greys out the rest of the article you're trying to read to... checks notes... ask if you want the article emailed to you? Who the hell thought that was a good idea?
5 comments

Why would you even browse the web without using an ad blocker?
So that you would notice sites that are serving obnoxious ads, and remember not to visit them in the future.

Maybe you are saying "the whole internet is like that now, it's impossible to find good sites without obnoxious ads", but I don't think it's that bad yet (hacker news is a good counterexample). But if everyone keep visiting user hostile sites, the site operators will see no incentive to change.

Frankly, I just don't care about the distinction. I'm going to engage with sites, I just choose not to download some of their content which I find annoying. Whether they offer that content or not doesn't matter to me at all, because I never see it anyway.

And for those that are countering this with "but some sites can only cover their costs using ads!" I say: Tough luck. I'm readily paying for things if I want them; if you can only offer something in exchange for advertisements, I don't want it.

The "ad" as described in my comment isn't really an ad in the typical sense, it's baked into the website. But the real reason is, I'm on my work computer and unable to install browser extensions.
You should urgently contact your IT department. Not enforcing ad blocking extensions is a security liability.
I'm in the IT department. Unfortunately massive global corporations routinely make extremely misguided decisions and don't particularly give a shit about what people like me have to say on the matter.
I'm well aware of all this, but I think you folks might be underestimating the hubris of gigantic corporations and how little my input as one IT guy at one little factory in one little part of the world means to the people who actually make decisions. Even if I wanted to bring these things to their attention, there is absolutely zero chance they'd ever so much as open an email from me. Whatever the company decides is gospel, only a fool would question their genius.
The site hides its content after a few seconds when using an ad blocker (on mobile Safari), showing a modal prompt asking to disable the ad blocker.

Of course there are ways around this, but at that point I don’t bother which such blogs anymore. It is a bit ironic given the subject of this blog post.

No good options on Android right now. You can use Firefox, but there are a lot of tradeoffs.
I'm curious what the tradeoffs are, I exclusively use FF and any time Chrome auto opens via a link I immediately baulk at the experience.
Save page, speed, battery life, bookmark sync, tab sync, and password sync are all slightly better in Chrome.

I used Firefox on Android for probably 11 years before switching to Dolphin (RIP) and then stock Chrome when Firefox made it a huge pain to install extensions. I keep waiting for someone to fully enable extensions on Chrome for Android.

I use FF exclusively and disabled chrome on my Android phone.

Lucky me :)

It went away when I scrolled past it, but it is still a form of a dickover that shouldn't happen on good websites.
And a clearly AI-generated or at least AI-assisted post.
It’s not clear to me. What makes you sure it’s AI assisted?
> Google Home used to be one of my favourite gadgets.

> Not because it was smart.

> Because it was useful.

I was half expecting "and that's bold" after that.

It might be quietly bold in a world of stunning declarations.
and load bearing
I promise you that she went through the effort of putting less ads than what Adsense does by default.
It is ironic that so many articles calling out enshittification are themselves examples of the same.