|
|
|
|
|
by Tiberium
10 days ago
|
|
I'll be honest: I don't have experience with audio stuff/age verification, but wouldn't it be far easier to bypass this than even face (live video) verification, let alone full KYC with ID? At that point it's not that much better than a "I'm over 18" button, or am I missing something? EDIT: The website itself partially answers my question: > Self-declaration, the "I am over 18" checkbox, is explicitly prohibited by every major regulator in the UK, EU, and Australia. But then: > Facial scanning works, but it builds infrastructure that outlasts the check. A system that estimates your age today can identify you tomorrow. Platforms that rolled it out met immediate backlash and reversals. Users do not trust platforms with their face. How would we trust your platform to not store voice fingerprints, then? (On a side note, all descriptions all LLM-written, but that's expected in 2026) |
|
> wouldn't it be far easier to bypass this than even face (live video) verification... or am I missing something?
Missing the experience of learning just how much information is in a clip of audio; replay/synthetic attack mitigation is baked in, and more cost-effective to run vs. video, and less creepy.
The mission: make the process easy (and inexpensive) as possible so that people can be verified at scale, without giving away their personal data and being the product.