[jdw64]

I saw the this post. Wasn't it a capture of something that actually happened? So it just described a real story. I can doubt the authenticity of all of it whether it's really true or not. but the content itself was interesting enough.

What I don't understand is this: 'Show sincerity'—that is, a human value. If it were AI-generated, stitched-together false content, I'd understand, but I see quite a few interesting points.

Whenever I see things like this, I always think of Sturgeon's law: 90% is bad, and only 10% is interesting. I get that most AI-generated content is AI slop. But even back when only humans could write, there were plenty of clickbait articles.

I agree that GEN AI spam content is generally bad, and I also agree that some of it may lack effort. But honestly, I'm not sure this content is completely meaningless.

Regardless of the packaging, if the content inside is interesting and valuable enough, I think that's what matters. I guess we just see things quite differently.

So what I'm saying is, I don't agree with the idea that he didn't care at all.