[JumpCrisscross]

PG&E is a failure. It’s wild prioritizing its reform and replacement isn’t seen as the existential threat to California Democrats’ national ambitions that it rightfully is.

Distribution shouldn’t be this expensive nor cause this many fires. If the cost of distributing power to remote, fire-prone communities isn’t politically feasible to push to them directly, the cities should be put on a separate distribution system to isolate the cost inflation.

Silicon Valley buys PG&E power and handles distribution itself. It has some of the only reasonable power rates in California [1].

[1] https://www.siliconvalleypower.com/residents/rates-and-fees

[chrisss395]

Wouldn't distribution naturally be the more expensive part vs. electricity generation given the latter is centralized and scaled? Perhaps this is a fallacy, but that is the thought that crossed my mind.

[JumpCrisscross]

> Wouldn't distribution naturally be the more expensive

I don’t know. What I do know is California spends more on distribution than anyone else in the country. That signals there is a better way to do this.