Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by frollogaston 3 days ago
If that's good long-term for the people in SF who've already invested their time and money there, shouldn't be any other way. It's also not some zero-sum game where voting against development always benefits them at the cost of others; sometimes they want development.
1 comments

It's not good long term for them though, as housing disparity statistically correlates to higher crime.
Maybe more development wouldn't have caused lower crime in SF, we won't know. And that's also not the only thing they care about.