[majorchord]

> Musk wrote, “Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change!!”

I'm certainly not defending the man, but that comment to me is definitely not plainly seen as "advocating riots"... I'd call that a very disingenuous stretch of the truth.

If we're going to criticize people, I think we need to do it for the right reasons.

[pjc50]

> protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY

For what outcome though, hmm?

The exact opposite logic gets applied against supporters of Palestine such as Sally Rooney, who was threatened with a total ban on her (unrelated) work until the High Court ruled in her favor.

[roryirvine]

And what the fuck does he think a protest on the lower Newtownards Rd looks like, given the complex history & social context?

He's not thick, he's (at best) reckless.

[ben_w]

> He's not thick, he's (at best) reckless.

Reckless definitely.

"Thick" is presently unclear: a lot of money and an existing competent team can hide a lot of damage upstairs; and it's not implausible that he has done that damage, even just because he is known to have sleeping difficulties[0], and sleeping difficulties are known to correlate with IQ impairment, and that's aside any questions about ketamine (between the war on drugs and AI SEO, I have no idea what that stuff really does).

[0] https://futurism.com/elon-musk-tweets-sleep