|
|
|
|
|
by shevy-java
46 days ago
|
|
Is this likely though? If you are an AI slop model that
spams out finding bugs and vulnerabilities, would you
want to become more active when you see that a project
is not actively fixing bugs? Because in my opinion, it
really would not matter for any AI model how active a
project is, when it comes to FINDING existing loopholes. In other words, I would always go at full speed (as an
evil AI slop model) and most likely never release any
findings of flaws and loopholes, so they can be exploited lateron. Bad folks don't want to be caught; remember the xz utils backdoor. I am sure some AI slop models are used by criminals.
And they may exploit things at a later time, but they
most likely have found issues already. Not every AI
slop model would report. The notion of "the bad guys will now be more active" is
strange really in the AI slop age. (We had the stone
age; now we have the slop age) |
|