[int_19h]

> the creator claims to have made this change clear in multiple locations

He made his stance on AI clear. He didn't say anything about deleting users' data until after the scandal broke.

[vkou]

'You are not allowed to, and shouldn't touch my repo with AI.' seems like a sufficient disclaimer for undefined behaviour.

It's pretty easy to adhere to that rule.

[thin_carapace]

'user data' in this case refers to your copy of his software. how should software react when its explicit prerequisites are not followed? should software do nothing and allow incorrect usage, therefore potentially leading to unaccounted issues down the track? do we complain that adobe is petulant for restricting product access when license conditions aren't met?