|
|
|
|
|
by PunchyHamster
9 hours ago
|
|
I wouldn't consider lib deleting itself as malware. User is not entitled to code they ignored main repo's page and docs. Tho not putting it in the license is stuff to criticise for sure, that's the place for it and it would make lib not open source. |
|
At least according to the prompt, the library was attempting to delete not just itself, but all tests that depend on it. I do think if the prompt was solely scoped to removing the dependency on the library, it would be somewhat more defensible. Even better if he suggested an alternative!