It's funny someone takes an Apple statement at face value instead of reading it for exactly what it is: they asked to be excluded from the law that was introduced to prevent exactly what Apple is trying to do.
After being denied an exception (which would have made mockery of the law), they come out all passive aggressive how EU is "not constructive".
After being denied an exception (which would have made mockery of the law), they come out all passive aggressive how EU is "not constructive".