|
|
|
|
|
by iliashad
47 days ago
|
|
> Aha, it makes total sense. This number sounds much more reasonable than “669 GB”, since the actual total size of processed frames would be like 10-30 GB. The reason why is “669 GB” is the total raw footage size when I'm doing the video processing, I downscaled each frame to 720p to make the video processing much faster and I don't need full original quality in order to get accurate results (as far as I know and experiment with). > I’m just curious tho — is there any paying options that can accelerate this kind of process? Just spin up GPU instances? For now, I found that NVIDIA GPU for example RTX 3060 with 12GB Vram was much faster than my M1 Max. (still working on optimizing for speed and accuracy). |
|