[Alifatisk]

> It's basically just more test time compute right?

I think this is the key takeaway from here.

[andai]

I took a better look at their graphs. Their Opus+Opus fusion indeed matches Fable on this benchmark, but costs nearly twice as much as Fable!

Meanwhile their "budget" fusion almost matches Fable, and costs half as much.

At least on this benchmark. (Which looks a bit odd to me, e.g. DeepSeek ouranks GPT-5.5, ???)

Would love to see more benchmarks testing this technique.