|
|
|
|
|
|
by benj111
11 days ago
|
|
|
>Losing a few percents in efficiency is an acceptable compromise for avoiding the use of expensive and supply-constrained chemical elements. Is it? A 1% decrease in efficiency means increased fuel costs for the user. Acceptability should be based on the long term costs v short term savings to the customer. It's this myopic, Thinking from the pov of the company, that leads to enshittification. I don't think we should be unquestionly accept that pov. |
|
|