[schamack]

That looks very impressive! And really insightful as well. And to my surprise, I even found my startup on the landing page :D (possibly due to fresh HN post here as well).

I will have a thorough look on the insights later, as there might either be some small false positives, or my projects still needs some grunt work :).

So from my perspective, being part of the check, I find it extremely useful.

[datafreak_]

Let me know if anything is detected wrong!

[schamack]

Alright, so I went through all the potential issues and already implemented the changes where applicable :).

My app is Tekyous (didn't go through this option to claim the launch): https://stackscope.dev/launch/xsa4cjwn/tekyous

And turns out that actually there were almost no false-positives here at all. Some of the flagged things were rather minor, like missing files that are not really necessary in my case, or too long meta descriptions, but technically all is flagged correctly even if severity is low.

But on the other hand, it has also correctly flagged my tracking settings or overly strict rules for AI crawlers, so this were genuinely useful for me to find out now.

And the only real false-positive is actually a recognised AI builder signature for Bolt.new - not sure where that one comes from, as Bolt.new was not used here. I've only used Claude Code, mostly with Anthropic + GLM by Z.AI models.

Hope that feedback helps you, as I have defnitely found it helpful on my end. Thanks!