|
|
|
|
|
by Schmerika
49 days ago
|
|
To be perfectly honest, I actually do think we should stop all the both sidesing - but only after following it to its logical conclusion. Have _both sides_ actively collaborated in genocide? ... Yes. Therefore, _both sides_ have breached any recognizable red line of decency. _Both sides_ have breached hard-won national and international law. Time for something better than both sides unapologetically arming live-streamed genocide. "Oh, you're one of those single issue guys" - if the issue is genocide, then yes. Why aren't you? Why aren't 98.15% of 2024 voters? As pointed out below: it's our culture. And that's not okay. > Your second sentence is a great example of the type of both-sidesing that needs to stop. I don't see how you can disagree with the simple truth of it tbh. In what way is that not what happened? |
|