| > I am saying this probably is "silly behavior by a government" and it is a milestone that points towards what the future may look like. Why can't it be both? Here is why it's unlikely this is anything other than "silly behavior by a government": - some benchmarks show GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1, and even Claude Opus outperforming Claude Fable, and yet it's Fable which is restricted. - some benchmarks still show the likes of Kimi 2.5 outperforming any Claude model, and DeepSeek is getting equivalent scores (a few tenths of a percent difference) > Do you think that Chinese labs will continue to release open models forever (...) That's immaterial to the discussion. Even if China forced Chinese labs to restrict access to all models, the truth of the matter is that Trump's administration to restrict access to US-based models does not prevent others from having access to models that are as capable or even better. So what's exactly the point of this? |