[ajyoon]

Is your legal theory that any technology which is dangerous should be protected under the second amendment, simply because it is dangerous?

[chatmasta]

No, my legal theory is that you cannot simultaneously compare technology to a weapon and also say it falls outside the bounds of the 2nd amendment.

[ajyoon]

Dual use does not mean weapon. And even then, it is simply not the case that all weapons fall under the second amendment.

[asadotzler]

a tactical nuke is a weapon to which the second amendment has no applicability