[Eridrus]

The difference between OpenAI & Anthropic is that OpenAI didn't do multiple big media pushes about how their models are so scary and dangerous.

OpenAI's models are very good, they have refusals + a government ID verification story for cyber access (I don't think they prevent non-US nationals, but I don't know this). What they don't have is Project Glasswing and all the hand wringing about how they're going to end the world in public.

I hope Anthropic pulls their head out of their ass and just starts acting like a normal company.

[jazzyjackson]

You’re telling me this testimony isn’t sincere marketing for how revolutionary and dangerous his product will become?

  OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testifies at Senate artificial intelligence hearing | full video“ (2023)

"My worst fears, are that we cause significant - we the field, the technology, the industry - cause significant harm to the world...If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong and we want to be vocal about that."

https://youtu.be/Pn-W41hC764

[datadrivenangel]

OpenAI did this back in 2024 several times.

[Eridrus]

I think Anthropic went a lot further with the marketing around Mythos/Glasswing.

OpenAI talked a lot about potential future risks. Anthropic went around saying "this model is too dangerous to give to people at all".