| > The island of Ireland has had pretty low immigration Seems like you just validated my point - a place without open borders is where a major outbreak of xenophobic violence is occurring, as opposed to mainland Europe. > if that's where you mean by "here" It's not, I live in Switzerland, which has one of the highest rates of migration in the EU > there was a palpable uptick in xenophobia when Romania and Bulgaria were admitted into the EU I'd be curious to know what this looked like at the time. Regardless, even if we accept it as an example, that doesn't set the rule or show a general causation between open borders and xenophobia > Pre-1902; one could haggle over the exact date depending on what one considers an open border. Omegalol - you might want to look up what modern day xenophobia in SA looks like (as well as the current socioeconomic situation) so you can see why that probably wasn't a concern pre-20th century |
We know exactly what caused this outbreak of xenophobic violence, it's in direct response to a dramatically brutal attempted murder by an immigrant caught on video (one who had been granted a refugee visa, on legitimate grounds or otherwise). That's hardly an argument for open borders - if anything it's an argument for stricter screening of asylum seekers.
> I'd be curious to know what this looked like at the time.
A shift in sentiment, certain kinds of comments being heard more and more, ultimately Brexit.
> even if we accept it as an example, that doesn't set the rule or show a general causation between open borders and xenophobia
At a certain point you experience enough correlations that you have to trust the evidence of your own eyes.