|
|
|
|
|
|
by hunterpayne
7 days ago
|
|
|
Agreed, the Google the author described arriving at probably didn't exist in 2017 like stated. It probably was dead by then. But since the author agreed with the politics at the time, they ignored this. Now that things continued to degrade and political winds changed and they have to deal with the negative consequences of some of those decisions, they are taking their ball and going home. Its really hard to take such articles seriously. Its borderline gaslighting and says a lot more about the author than Google or US politics. In fact, even though I have no idea who this person is, I don't have a good opinion of them after reading this. And that ironically was the exact opposite of the intended effect of writing this for the author. |
|
|
It is not hypocrisy at all to change opinion on the company as the company politics changes. That is actually "being consistent".
Being ok with some things and being against other things is perfectly fine and valid.