Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by joe_mamba 6 hours ago
>I recommend you watch Judgment at Nuremberg - the 1961 film

Wait, you're actually judging historical events of Nazi Germany based on Hollywood movies written, directed and produced by jews[1], and taking them as unbiased ground truth? That would be like trusting the judge to your trial when he's the same family as the plaintiff. How about maybe listening to unbiased sources that didn't have skin in the game? Because otherwise I can recommend you plenty of Iranian movies explaining why they're innocent and Israel is to blame for their troubles, or plenty of speeches of Netanyahu saying how his military murdering Palestinian children is legitimate justice by the books.

The Nuremberg trials prosecutors actively denied, hid, and even manipulated and destroyed evidence that was going to work in favor for the plaintiffs, just to ensure they get the rope.[2]

Just use your brain for 3 seconds, there's no way a trial run, controlled and funded by the victors was going to be allowed to work against the victors and make them look bad on the international stage, same how no Hollywood movies made on this topic by jews were gonna be unbiased. It was a sham trail through and through, with 100% of the effort going on adding a layer of legitimacy to it while aiming for the same outcome.

It's the same as when you hear corrupt police departments or government institutions today say "we investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong". And their corruption only gets unveiled when a higher power like a federal or international court gets involved. Except in the Nuremberg case there was no higher power other than the victors who had skin in the game.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_at_Nuremberg

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaeGkvy_P5c

1 comments

Who on earth would you expect to have been unbiased about World War II and the holocaust in 1961?

> written, directed and produced by jews

Really weird thing to look for and point out.