|
|
|
|
|
|
by jason_oster
9 hours ago
|
|
|
Your argument is something along the lines of: 1. People dislike X, so a small amount of water being used for X is bad. 2. People like Y, so a large amount of water being used for Y is good. You can't draw any conclusions from this, apart that people dislike some things and like other things. The argument establishes no relation to water usage. That makes the argument against AI "an ethical one because of water usage" just a trope. |
|
|