[dakiol]

> and should a company decide not to use AI they will have a hard time retaining devs (and they will need more devs)

Need more devs? Why? If a company was being profitable just fine prio AI era, they will still be profitable if they decide not to use AI. Shipping crap faster is not a formula for success. Shipping quality faster? I prefer shipping quality at a good pace

[vanuatu]

youll be outcompeted by companies that do use it (caveat: effectively)

growth is much more important than profitability

[californical]

Will you though? I see this repeated, but I’ve almost never changed products because one has 10x more features than another.

I usually buy and use products that are simple and effective, and that get out of my way to do the thing that I want to do.

For email, I’m a happy customer of Fastmail and I’ve been paying them for years. I don’t care if they ever release a new feature and I’d never switch away from them to a competitor that’s less stable but does more. They release improvements slowly but they are very stable. But I would switch away from them if they start shoving AI into things or delivering subpar features that make my email worse.

For healthcare related websites, I can already see my test results, schedule appointments, and communicate with my doctor. What more could an AI-driven medical platform give me that makes my life better?

For maps — I unfortunately had to move away from Apple recently when they added Ads. So I’m mostly just using OpenStreetMaps. I could see AI improving the OSM functionality by updating the app (OrganicMaps) routing algorithms and such, so there is room for growth there, but it’s not that massive.

Can anyone offer features that Uber can’t now due to LLMs? There are a bunch of local Uber competitors but uber wins because it’s easy and there aren’t major features to differentiate there.

Do you have examples that prove that delivering a bunch of features really fast is going to steal customers from something?

[jimbokun]

Well this is a different argument, that we really don’t need very much new software because so much of what was needed is already written.

I’m sympathetic to this argument. But it’s orthogonal to the AI question.

[vanuatu]

your personal experience is clearly in the techie bubble

ai is more than delivering features fast (thats probably one of the lowest priorities for companies)

right now its a race to automate work, especially back office. companies already are seeing 10M+ in savings and revenue growth and we're barely starting. workflows in sales, outbound, gtm, marketing, eng, operations, compliance, kyc etc

consumer is a different beast, consumers want convenience which has already been hyperoptimized and the big consumer cos run on network effs instead of features

[fzeroracer]

> right now its a race to automate work, especially back office. companies already are seeing 10M+ in savings and revenue growth

What? Where? Citations please. We're seeing big companies massively stall in all traditional sectors except AI which is a irrational market built off hype.

[vanuatu]

ai companies know how to use the tools internally, not surprising

there are no citations yet because this is going on behind closed doors, if you know you know. we'll start seeing it in the financials of companies soon. alternatively you can look at the revenue growth of applied ai companies

[jimbokun]

“Trust me, bro”

[bitwize]

Enjoy getting your milkshake drunk by AI-first companies then.