Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sarchertech 1 day ago
Yeah but a lot of the guardrails are pretty obviously to prevent competition not for safety.
1 comments

Hmm. Maybe they are concerned about state actors trying to train equivalent models without the safeguards?
If a for profit company does a thing that could be motivated by profit or altruism, which of those 2 motivations do you think is most likely?
When they've repeatedly made decisions against their for profit nature, it changes the calculus a bit.
They haven't though. There's a long term plan here, and the goal is power and wealth. Short term moves that appear irrational turn out to be rational (from a greed perspective) when you factor in other considerations, like: Use their own AGI to create every software product on Earth and swallow the worlds economy. And we're kindly feeding their systems our codebases, IP and business decision-making so they can do exactly that.

Not a single thing Anthropic has done has been altruistic, and it never will be. It's all smoke and mirrors for the end goal.

If this was true they'd never have picked a fight with the DOW and they'd release Fable without safeguards.
How do you not recognize that the safeguards provide obvious benefits to the company?
Why invent new motives for Anthropic when their real motives are plain and obvious and have been confirmed time and time again by their behavior over the last few years? Their concern is their own power and wealth. Every other conceivable motive is secondary to that.
More like concerned about distillation.