[nonethewiser]

>I'd be surprised if anyone can get any output from it that couldn't easily be replaced with a search from wikipedia.

I dont understand. This is just hyperbole right? The outputs are basically infinite and wikipedia most certainly isnt infinite.

[satvikpendem]

> The outputs are basically infinite

If the model refuses to output, then it's actually finite, zero.

[nonethewiser]

No, of the model always refuses to output then it’s finite

[satvikpendem]

For certain use cases, it seems it does always refuse, therefore it's finite.

[nonethewiser]

No.

B + C = A

B is finite

C is infinite

Therefor A is infinite

[satvikpendem]

That's over all categories. If A is cyber security and B is biology topics, then C is still zero, therefore finite. Anyway, I think you're reading too much into an offhand comment.

[torben-friis]

The decimals of 1/3 are infinite as well and they don't contain a better-than-wikipedia article.

And even if they did, it would be useless if it's buried in useless data and your chances or pulling it are effectively zero.

This is regardless of the general discussion, just pointing that your argument isn't solid.

[nonethewiser]

Sorry but that’s not the claim. The claim is wikipedia can return the same information. Please find me a migration script given my current db schema and new target schema.

The claim is absurd.