|
|
|
|
|
by areoform
6 days ago
|
|
So I suspect Anthropic started A/B testing or just plain testing this a while ago, Tell HN: Claude flags biology / biotech questions
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47929885 Today, it's flagging population research questions, Using only the dataset you constructed, assess two questions:
1. **Mortality:** do [GROUP] show mortality that differs
from (a) your comparison groups and (b) era- and sex-matched US population
expectations (e.g., SSA cohort life tables)?
2. **Late-life outcomes:** define an endpoint you consider fair (justify it),
and assess whether [GROUP] differs from comparators. State
explicitly how your `documentation_depth` codings affect the strength of any
conclusion — i.e., quantify or bound the ascertainment problem rather than waving at it.
Choose your own methods and justify them. Report effect sizes with confidence intervals,
not just p-values. State conclusions plainly, including "no detectable difference" if
that is what your analysis shows — a null is an acceptable answer for either question
independently. Document any additional judgment calls (index date for time-at-risk,
reference population construction, endpoint definition) in the same decision-log style.
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/66780Censored because I'm writing a paper. :) Oh and forget learning about chemistry. Only criminals want to learn organic chemistry. :( |
|