[satvikpendem]

How will you know the difference unless you are a bat? You cannot.

[kelseyfrog]

I can. You don't have access to my subjective experience to be able to claim I don't.

[satvikpendem]

You can't because you cannot become a bat, so thinking you can is just that, thought. I don't need your subjective experience to know.

[kelseyfrog]

Are you claiming you know what it is like to be me? You can't know about the bat thing unless you know what it is like to be me.

[satvikpendem]

I know you're a human, therefore I know you cannot know what it's like to be a bat, as an objective fact, regardless of how you think you think subjectively.

[kelseyfrog]

I am a human who objectively knows what it's like to be a bat.

I have greater epistemic authority over what I know than others.

[satvikpendem]

> who objectively knows what it's like to be a bat.

Sigh. Thinking you know and knowing is not the same, especially thinking you "objectively" know something. Maybe you should read the article posted instead of commenting these sorts of sentences.