| The founders and business models of Costco, Patagonia and Novo Nordisk are so radically different from so-called "tech startup" founders^1 that one must consider this in any analysis 1. Who lack a legitimate business model hence have resorted to "data collection from/about computer users, surveillance of computer users even when engaged in non-commercial activity and online advertising services" with generally free, so-called "products" and "services" offered as bait "There's a darkness in our industry that we often don't talk about." It's "talked" about on HN but voters and commenters working for or aspiring to start/work for these companies don't like the discussion 100% probability this comment will be greyed out to try to hide it from people using graphical web browsers (no effect on monochrome text-only browser users) The people that start "tech" companies are often soulless and maladapted to society, having hid behind computers to escape their inability to deal with the real world. There are also "tech startups" founded by people who want to take advantage of those who have hidden behind computers and lack social skills, using them as pawns These founders and pawns do not start, nor do they want to work for, companies like Costco, Patagonia or Novo Nordisk because they only believe in what they see on a computer screen not the real world. They want to operate in Silicon Valley fantasy land It really isn't surprising what happens to so-called "tech" companies over time considering what they start from The author worked for Kleiner Perkins, SillyCon Valley VC After listening to this guy you may feel like you need a shower |
Yes. Of course.
You cannot trust anyone to have a rounded mind unless they have actually done more than one thing, broadly speaking.
Having worked at one of these companies, I don't buy for one second, that these companies are not obsessed with financial benefit. You would be an absolute idiot to believe that.