| Just tried it. Fable is extremely strong. The fact that we can't point to any concrete architectural upgrade is worrying - that means "it just gets bigger" is kind of viable. To be clear, the jump from Opus to Fable was like the jump from pre o3 -> o3 for me. Very sharp improvement, not incremental. But that could be explained by dummy long thinking times. It one shot a task that Opus burned hundreds of dollars on to get nowhere. Very tricky semantic refactor, got it right. Granted, again, the semantics Opus and I fleshed out 3 months prior, but Opus couldn't execute on the vision. Fable could. Then I discussed some philosophy and it was actually both pleasant (GPT constantly "corrected" you for the sake of correction without clarification, also still often just wrong; it's like it refused to think critically about philosphy) and accurate, and actually helped resolve some deep but subtle misconceptions I had around representationalism. When talking with GPT I felt like I was talking with someone who either was sycophantic or "anything that is not absolute truth is relativism" - Fable actually discussed. Both is exciting and kind of makes me depressed. I can definitely see why people are getting hyped about AGI again. All the models were extremely strong technically but I felt like couldn't match the developer's tacit state - Fable definitely did, and that's a basic quailty to be considered "usefully intelligent" IMO, at least to me. Shame that it's going away in 2 weeks and probably going to be nerfed if/when it's re-released. |