|
|
|
|
|
by zephen
4 days ago
|
|
If you read the other comments, you're certainly an outlier in this belief. My own answer is that there is nothing (incromulent? uncromulent? well, anyway, not cromulent) about suing people who knowingly and deliberately racked up debts with you, but that common business practices, including the overwhelming abundance of free services everywhere in every product category, and the ability to immediately shut off internet services when you aren't paid, lead to sort of a gestalt of expectations about how things are done. The article itself says that the terms of service only allow billing if a payment method have been provided, so suing absent that provision would probably be a non-starter anyway. On the bright? side, suing would definitely keep them on the front page of hacker news longer. |
|