Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by justinclift 3 days ago
Wonder if they'd be better served $$$ wise to use dedicated servers or similar?
2 comments

Yes, having a performant CI server on premises would probably pay itself in less than three months.

Startups are usually resource-rich and time-poor, and don't want to allocate employee time to infrastructure unless it's core to their business, so arguments for efficient spending there are easily overlooked.

We used to have self-hosted runners on Hetzner dedicated servers, and we migrated to UbiCloud ~6 months ago.

Unless you can optimise your CI runtime to be very balanced and fast, you're going to have a lot of jobs queued during working hours ... although it costs more per minute, the fact that CI jobs are bursty means it works out not too much costlier but with less queue time.

Oh good point. Hadn't thought of the bursty nature of the load.

Sounds like you need to share infra with an org of similar needs in a vastly different timezone.

I guess that's what SaaS CI solutions are in a way. :)