[jreynar]

Ugh. I'm sure we're not the only company that's going to face the difficult decision to either stay with Opus 4.8, switch to a different model provider or update and significantly weaken our terms of service around no model re-training, not sending data to third parties and the like. I understand why Anthropic wants to do this but I'd be much more comfortable with it if the data never made it to Anthropic unless an analysis Amazon ran, maybe even using tools from Anthropic, determined that there was something to look at. That'd be an easier carve out in an enterprise Terms Of Service / Privacy Policy.

[jstummbillig]

Can you explain what AWS supposedly guarantees currently that your company values? I am not super familiar with the platform but I would assume, just like any other US company, that they will provide data to US agencies upon legal request as per CLOUD act, regardless of place of storage etc.

[calgoo]

First of all, the servers i run this on sits in the EU. While the Cloud Act can and would effect this that is not the concern from corporate.

If we as a company allow the data to be copied to other regions outside the EU then WE are not compliant with the rules and can be punished for it. That is what corporate is worried about. Just like we have a deal with OpenAI, but no documentation etc is allowed to be shared and that is being monitored by our SIEM platforms.

[jstummbillig]

That sounds like it's mostly just collective whitewashing, in face of essentially no guarantees when push comes to shove?

[Eridrus]

Yes, this whole kerfuffle is about contractual agreements between companies, not about governments.

I take my legal risk more seriously than I do people's paranoia about the NSA coming for them.