[tantalor]

No that's not what's happening here.

> According to the court, the Al mixed up information about other, genuinely sketchy companies with the plaintiffs and drew connections that didn't appear in any of the linked sources.

Implying: if the false claim was found in the sources then it would be protected speech.

There is nothing special about "answer machine" versus "search engine". You are making that part up.

[cyanydeez]

You're attacking semantics. the decision is entirely about the reliability and liability./