[throwaw12]

> I’m skeptical that general purpose LLMs are a good fit for a very specialized medical analysis task

If they can save more lives without harming other lives I would gladly take it during the analysis. Even saving 1% more lives is an amazing achievement!

[fabbbbb]

How will this lead to saving lives? The only possible consequence is abortion?

[Silamoth]

If a couple gives birth to a baby with a debilitating condition and dies after 6 weeks, that’s an additional baby death. If instead of having that baby, a couple gives birth to a healthy baby, it will likely survive into adulthood, meaning there’s one less baby death.

It sounds like you just take issue with abortion. That’s more of a you problem than a problem with quantifying baby deaths.

[fabbbbb]

This is an anecdotal example, isn’t it? What do people today abort for, after genetic diagnosis? Down-Syndrome and other markers with highly random and non-fatal outcomes.

I have no problem with abortion itself.

[throwaw12]

in some cases early and correct diagnosis saves lives. may not be applicable for the OPs situation, but imagine running full diagnosis is so cheap at some point in the future that every kid when they born get that diagnosis cheaply and automatically. And doctors do not need to "guess" based on symptoms.